Home
Burn burn BURN

Blah Blah Blah Blah

Posted on 2009.01.05 at 02:17
Current Mood: aggravated
Tags:
The last time I got totally involved in an online debate justifying Israel's actions was back in the wild days of the alt.callahans news-groups. I literally spent hours everyday, for a week, researching and debating a single thread. I wish I could find it on Google! I don't have that type of energy any more. So [info]odanu, I'll maybe pull off one final response, tomorrow morning, to your questions (y'all can go read it here, if you promise to play politely). Despite my respect for [info]odanu, I think I've moved past the stage of trying to actually explain these issues to ANY-body on the net, at least during the fighting. It's just too draining and annoying, and with extremely few exceptions, I've never gotten the pig to sing.

Just two final points:
1) Watch this very short film aptly titled 15 Seconds:



Requires Flash. A direct link, if the embedded one doesn't work: 15 Seconds.

This has been going on almost daily, for the past seven years. Where the fuck was the "international community" then? I have a cousin, Noam Bedin, who lives in this town of Sderot. His job is to try and mitigate media bias, and make sure the cry of Sderot is heard. I have another much younger cousin, who is receiving treatment for being "shell-shocked". Don't tell me these are improvised home-made weapons. These are government massed-produced death. The only real explanation why despite thousands of such rocket attacks, so few Israelis have died, is because G-d watches over his chosen. But that's not an argument that will get you many "points" in a debate...

2) A simple visual reminder of what the term Genocide actually means:



This is the family tree of the immediate family of my great-grandparents Moshe and Gittle Pollak of Sighet, Romania. I could just as easily expanded this tree in both directions by adding their siblings, but that would be very incomplete, because even the information itself is mostly lost. Of the twenty-two people represented here, being the parents, eleven siblings, their wives and children, FOUR survived (my grandmother, Cecillia Etkin, who lived through Auschwitz and three sisters, hidden as non-Jews). That is Genocide. When we have a hundred thousand dead in Gaza, then you could think of using that word. The term "cultural genocide" is utter bullshit. The only way to "kill" a culture, is to kill it's members. Just ask the English, they tried destroying the Irish culture. Just ask the Egyptians, Assyrians, Greeks, Romans and Communists. They ALL tried it with those ever so "problematic" Jews. Fat lot of good it did them.

But frankly, and I'm sure this will annoy a hell of a lot of you open-minded liberals, the so-called Religion Of Peace, was NEVER anything of the sort (except perhaps very briefly under the influence of the Spanish Moors, back in the 12th century). Even more so than the blood-thirsty European Christians. This is a "culture" in which it is normative for a father/brother to gladly slaughter his daughter/sister if he disapproves of how she dresses, all in the name of "family honor". This is a "culture" in which mothers pray that their adolescent son be worthy of them and blow himself up before breakfast, just as long as he kills some infidels too. Need I say more?

So yes indeed I DO believe that as a group/culture the Arabs are incapable of being reasoned with, or even know how to act in their own interest. You show me another culture that so thoroughly overruns the most basic biological imperatives... Even the best of negotiators would have a impossible task in dealing with damn Nihilists, who's only wish is to sow Death and Destruction, regardless of who they kill, including their own people. This is a "culture" the world is best without, yes. And yes, NOT all Muslims are raving lunatics, frothing at the mouth, but then neither are all Christians equally "devout".

There will NEVER be peace in the Middle-East, until the Arabs BEG us to stop killing them. Sadly, Israel yet lacks the fibre/desperation to actually retaliate properly, so that won't happen either. Certainly not in THIS round of fighting. Now, of course, we are all waiting to see how soon our northern friendly neighbor Nassralla will follow through on his since retracted promise to attack Israel in response to Gaza. My step-brother has been emergency reserve-activated to watch the Lebanese border, and my brother in-law is very likely to go into Gaza. Personally, the only change for me, is that my college is closed for the duration, being within the area targeted by the missiles.

* Exhaustion *

Comments:


Syona aka the Silicon Shaman
[info]siliconshaman at 2009-01-05 01:12 (UTC) (Link)
Problem is, the Arabs will never sue for peace, not while Israel is denying them their land [as they see it], by the simple act of existing, and then killing them when they 'retaliate' for this. the more you kill, the more you actually promote their terrorist mind-set.

To be honest, from over here, neither-side seem to be rational or open to any kind of reasoned debate or settlement short of outright genocide.

Yes, I know it's an ugly word, but when you have ~500 aprox Palestinian dead to 4 Israeli dead, I think Israel stands accused just as much as the other side...and seems to be winning the race.

Is it a culture the world could do without..probably.. but that does not mean it's right to kill them all. That 'solution' was tried once, remember. It can work, but only if you're willing to pay the morally high price.

Frankly, short of a stratospherically high wall, or separate planets, the killing is going to go on until there's no-one left alive on one side or the other.

Edited at 2009-01-05 01:15 am (UTC)
Introspection Addict
[info]spider88 at 2009-01-05 02:44 (UTC) (Link)
That's cheery.

I'm sick of Islam and how it gets defended for being just an equivalent religion as any other. Horsecrap.

I understand the Israeli attack, but I agree it's not going to fix the problem unless they actually kill them all.

Their society has to be reformed.
Syona aka the Silicon Shaman
[info]siliconshaman at 2009-01-05 09:10 (UTC) (Link)
Islam as it is written is pretty much an equal religion. Islamic culture in some countries [most actually], isn't. But then, Christianity historically isn't any better, as Shmuel pointed out.

I think this is going to end very badly... you can't reform a culture that's determined to kill itself and you with it. They can wipe them out, but then Israel's neighbours would probably pick up where the Palestinians left off. About the best possible outcome is if the Israelis manage to wipe out the majority, but enough flee across the borders to become as much a problem to the neighbouring countries as they are/were to Israel, thus robbing themselves of any sympathy.

Which isn't really solving the problem, just moving it slightly.

I don't do cheery, I do realistic.
Shmuel A. Kam
[info]shmuelisms at 2009-01-05 12:08 (UTC) (Link)

Islam

Islam as it is written is pretty much an equal religion.
That TOO is another of those nice Politically-Correct lies said so as to appear to not be against Islam itself, don't ya' know.

Islam Head Honcho, Muhammad his very self, divided the world neatly into two. The World of Peace i.e. "them", and the [to be killed] World of the Sword i.e. the rest of us. Only he specifically meant you, because us Peoples of the Book (i.e. Christians and Jews), are exempt from death (thank you very much), and must "only" be subjugated, as head-tax paying Dhimmies. It was only his later followers that said "you know what, feel free to also kill Christians and Jews". It was Muhammad himself that established the principal that it was OK, to violate a god-sworn oath/agreement, if it meant you could screw-over some of your enemies.

He laid down the foundations of death and trickery. His followers merely lavishly embellished these points.

The only reason that Egypt actually helped with this attack on Gaza, is precisely because they are scared shitless of having more radical Muslims move into ever-less stable Egypt. Lebanon is already pretty much a "failed state" due to problems caused by the "Palestinian refugee". The population of Jordan IS already 80% "refugee" derived. Now if we could move our lot into Syria, THAT would be cool. Assad Jr. would go bat-shit crazy!
Introspection Addict
[info]spider88 at 2009-01-05 16:48 (UTC) (Link)
Realistically....wouldn't it be more likely to reform them than exterminate them? For every one you kill, you create at least one more.
Syona aka the Silicon Shaman
[info]siliconshaman at 2009-01-05 20:46 (UTC) (Link)
Ideally, that would be the logical path... but neither side is being logical, or even remotely reasonable. The current policy of extermination is doomed to failure, for that very reason.

But the punishment killings [on both sides] will continue because both sides are convinced that if they kill enough of the other side then they will cave in and give up.

Which of course, won't happen.
Introspection Addict
[info]spider88 at 2009-01-06 00:28 (UTC) (Link)
I'm not sure why you're (and everyone else) is pitting this as Israel against Palestine. This is a worldwide Muslim problem, with terrorist attacks being made worldwide.

Syona aka the Silicon Shaman
[info]siliconshaman at 2009-01-06 01:26 (UTC) (Link)
Because it would be a grave mistake to make that assumption.

Muslims are no more a cohesive or homogeneous group than are Christians.
The problem in Israel and Gaza is no more related to the attacks in Iraq or Afghanistan, because they involve Muslims, than the terrorist actions of the IRA in Northern Ireland were related to ETTA in Spain or Ayran Nation or KKK in the USA.

The causes are unrelated, the cultural context is Muslim but the causes are local.

or to put it simply...Islam is not the problem, it gives it context and a veneer, it shapes the how of their actions, but the causes lie outside of Islam itself. Witness the fact that the vast majority of Muslims live at peace with their neighbours, where there is no history of violence.
Introspection Addict
[info]spider88 at 2009-01-06 01:30 (UTC) (Link)
The problem in Israel and Gaza is no more related to the attacks in Iraq or Afghanistan, because they involve Muslims, than the terrorist actions of the IRA in Northern Ireland were related to ETTA in Spain or Ayran Nation or KKK in the USA.

I'll have to give that some thought and research. It's not my understanding, but I'm no expert.
Shmuel A. Kam
[info]shmuelisms at 2009-01-05 22:03 (UTC) (Link)

"Practically"

"Practically" speaking, NO. It IS so much easier to kill someone than to reform them. Reforming folks takes years of hard work. Creating terrorists also takes years, I mean they're no good before the age of 12 or so. Killing someone, or better yet, LOTS of someones at the same time, just takes some resolution, and a fully armed F15.

Yes, of course I'm being sarcastic.

What [info]siliconshaman insists on failing to comprehend, is that IF these were merely random "punishment killings", then indeed we'd be using an F15 instead of risking foot soldiers (it's actually cheaper too). Rather we just want to STOP/apprehend those specific terrorists that persist in attacking us, and making life hell for a quarter million Israelis.

Never mind that it impossible to "reform" someone, without their full support.
Introspection Addict
[info]spider88 at 2009-01-06 00:29 (UTC) (Link)

Re: "Practically"

You can dramatically reform a culture in less than two generations. You start with the young ones.
Syona aka the Silicon Shaman
[info]siliconshaman at 2009-01-06 01:43 (UTC) (Link)

Re: "Practically"

But in order for that to work, you have to remove the adult's influence. Anything else will fail, it's been tried with the Welsh and the Australian aborigines.

I don't know what the word for erasing a culture, but leaving the people alive is...but I've read about it and it isn't pretty.
Introspection Addict
[info]spider88 at 2009-01-06 06:50 (UTC) (Link)

Re: "Practically"

Is it less pretty than endless war?
Syona aka the Silicon Shaman
[info]siliconshaman at 2009-01-06 01:40 (UTC) (Link)

Re: "Practically"

I didn't say they were random.. well not on the Israeli side [hard to tell with Hamas, those rockets don't aim very well.]

No, I understand very well that Israel has set itself the task of trying to find those responsible and to punish them...

What I think Israeli politicians fail to realise is the scale of the problem. The 'resistance' doesn't have a leader, or even leaders as such, except as inspirational figureheads... and just about every male and quite a few female are part of it, because enrolment is as simple as picking up a gun or a rock, and saying you're part of it all.

Israel, whether your leaders know it or not, has just about succeeded in radicalising the entire population, and that's who they're fighting... and honestly, I think they're all about ready to fight to the last one standing.

So, functionally, your army is pretty much going to have to treat everyone in Gaza as a potential combatant, and lay the smack down on anyone and everyone...which makes it the same as randomly doing so, in a sense. Because, while the stated aim is to punish and deter those involved...that pretty much includes everyone who's not Jewish!

I don't think reform is going to work... not when both sides seem to be addicted to violence and either in denial over that, or actively embracing it.
Shmuel A. Kam
[info]shmuelisms at 2009-01-05 10:39 (UTC) (Link)

Land?

That's a Damn Lie, repeated SO often it has become accepted as Truth Inviolate. This was never REALLY about the land. This "conflict" started long before ANYbody had any land or spoke of countries and faux nationalism (the percentage of local land-owners in the feudal Ottoman Empire was negligible). By the time of the 1929 Hebron Massacre (condoned by the British, BTW), this conflict was "long established", going back, here at least since the 1880s. But even THAT wasn't the "beginning", as Jews living in Muslim countries, have been persecuted for centuries, pretty much since the advent of Islam, often even more so that in Europe (and it takes a LOT of effort to "top" that).

Minor correction: The Arabs have 500 dead, and THEY will be the first to admit, that at least 400 of those, are combatants. All 5 of those Israelis are civilians. So the numbers and percentages are totally different.

While some critics, especially that blathering idiot Chompsky, will say it's a flawed source, it IS a damn good starting point. So I highly recommend people read From Time Immemorial by Joan Peters, if you can find it. Funny thing is, this book was initially funded by the Royal Family of Saudi, i.e. she set out to prove the exact opposite of what she found. To say the least, Their Royal Highnesses Were Not Pleased.
Syona aka the Silicon Shaman
[info]siliconshaman at 2009-01-05 20:52 (UTC) (Link)

Re: Land?

I know it's not about the land.. but it's become so much an article of faith that it might as well be true, it has the same affect as if it was.

I don't distinguish between combatants and non-combatants.. a life is a life. So it's still 500 on one side and half a dozen on the other.
Sister Goldberg, I presume?
[info]cecerose at 2009-01-05 05:46 (UTC) (Link)

singing pigs?

I'm sure that a euphemism for something...

Right there's someone on FB, who, if I was even 5 years younger, I'd probably get into a big flame war with. But I agree, it's not worth the time and energy. Of course the fact that on FB, most people on my list are people I work with, and this bozo is a graduate student, it's probably not a good idea. I'm left of center, but I have to admit the whole leftist/progressive negative attitude towards Israel bothers the f*ck out of me. Bunch of self righteous elitist snobs, who boast about finding "vegan" suit for interviewing that ONLY cost $500.00.

When I was in college, one of the things I learned quickly about the left is that they're not above exploiting people for their political ends, despite their protestations.

I'm convinced most of them don't even CARE about the Palestinians, except to the extent it proves their case that the Israel and United States are EVIL INCARNATE. Puleez. The minute this crisis has passed, they'll be off to their next flavor of oppressed people of the moment. But if you happen to be a petty dictator (like say, Kim Jong Il, who's systematically starving his people to death) that gets a pass.

Bunch of self righteous, self important, prigs who can seriously talk about finding a "vegan" suit for ONLY $500.00, while passing moral judgments on others from the comfort of their keyboards.

Makes me ill. I can see myself doing a lot of breathing and meditation so I don't strangle certain individuals.

Shmuel A. Kam
[info]shmuelisms at 2009-01-05 10:06 (UTC) (Link)

Re: singing pigs?

As much as I dislike the so-called "philosophy" of American science-fiction writer, Robert A. Heinlein (AKA RAH), he WAS often a damn-good author, and certainly very crafty with words (you'd have to be to "sell" his vapidness as "inspired"). So "singing pigs" is a reference to a famous quote of his:
"Never try to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and it annoys the pig."
meaning don't persist in trying to get someone to do what they are incapable of... In this case, if people HERE, with all of the facts, are incapable of understanding the situation, what can you expect from people half way around the world, who are seeing the "picture" through an extremely distorted lens (the media), have their own strong [unconscious] cultural biases, and haven't a clue what antisemitism is (like nothing else, anywhere). So really, WHAT can I expect from them?

That debate I mentioned, was actually NOT a flame-war. It was mostly very reasonable, well thought out and documented. So after having spent at least thirty hours in a week, deconstructing media lies, bringing counter sources and examples, a [now] very good friend of mine said something like "You know, NOW I am beginning to understand the Israeli position." Seeing that response, was totally a bang-head-on-wall moment. This from an audience of the MANY thousands. There have been others I have "converted", but the success rate is impossible to deal with. While I NEVER really cared about hopelessly biases, rather dual-valued World-Opinion of Israel, I now care even less. When, they, IF ever, reach the level of our morality. Then, maybe, I'll heed them.

As to your liberal "friends and neighbors", yeah. You might want to read what Flower-Power Peace-Loving San-Francisco has devolved into, just scroll down to the slogans shouted: Jew Hate in SF.
TBird
[info]64tbird at 2009-01-05 13:17 (UTC) (Link)

Re: singing pigs?

Gregg was rather baffled by the slogans and wondered if half these people had ever been awake during history class.

"Zion Nazis!" impressed him the most. He was utterly dumbfounded, and trust me - that's not easy to do to Gregg.
[info]gh4acws at 2009-01-05 07:29 (UTC) (Link)

horses sing,

pigs fly - I think.
Expecting neither.

I can't get the video to work. ( reinstalling Firefox and trying to load with IE did not help ) BUT do not need it to get the point.
You missed listing the Germans. Not that anyone needs a reminder. (I think)

Shmuel A. Kam
[info]shmuelisms at 2009-01-05 10:14 (UTC) (Link)

Re: horses sing,

I was referring to a famous quote from RAH, about teaching pigs to sing. See above. The "video" uses Flash. And you're right, for some reason it now fails to work. I'll post a direct link, instead of embedding it: 15 Seconds.
The Mad One
[info]madfedor at 2009-01-05 14:31 (UTC) (Link)
I just sit here in the US and grieve.

You and your family are always in my thoughts, especially when things heat up like the last few weeks. I've given up hoping that most humans will think, and my efforts to lead them to knowledge have diminished of late. My hat's off to you for still trying.
Jonathan
[info]ilca at 2009-01-06 11:39 (UTC) (Link)

Arguing is hopeless

Arguing is hopeless for two reasons:

1. You can't convince someone that doesn't want to be convinced.

2. The West cannot begin to understand the Arab mind, their culture of hate, their glorifying of death.

3. The world hates Israel. Even if you are arguing with someone that is honestly trying to understand, he/she has been strongly influenced by the media.
Jane
[info]jane_etrix at 2009-01-06 20:53 (UTC) (Link)
As one of the open-minded liberals who love you, I gotta pipe up here, although I can't say I'm terribly annoyed :) Also, none of this is really a comment on the current action in Gaza.

But frankly, and I'm sure this will annoy a hell of a lot of you open-minded liberals, the so-called Religion Of Peace, was NEVER anything of the sort...

Honor killings predate Islam by centuries and are also perpetrated by members of other religious groups. It's not a hallmark of Islam, not by a long shot. The concept of martyrdom and/or the use of children/adolescents as fighters is also not exclusive to Islam. Even if these things were exclusive to Islam, it is not a majority of Muslims who kill their daughters or encourage their children to become martyrs.

So yes indeed I DO believe that as a group/culture the Arabs are incapable of being reasoned with, or even know how to act in their own interest. You show me another culture that so thoroughly overruns the most basic biological imperatives...

You already know how I feel about people banging on about the superiority of Western Civilization and/or Christianity, so I won't go into that here. Arabs are not the only Muslims, and Arabs (as well as Muslims of other ethnicities) are just as capable of reason as any other group of people. If they aren't doing what you or I or Israel or the U.S. or anyone else want them to do, it does not follow they are incapable of reason. Ultimately, if you were correct about Arabs (or Muslims in general) being just nihilistic and destructive, they'd be waging total war, regardless of the consequences. But they aren't.

Personally, I can't think of any culture, state, religious or ethnic group which does not act counter to any number of so-called biological imperatives. Currently, I'd argue North Korea is the most egregious offender against the primary biological imperative (namely feeding themselves), and they're atheists. The only reason they don't pose a more serious threat (and they certainly pose a serious threat) is because there are comparatively few of them. The problem is not with any given religion, philosophy and certainly not with ethnicity. The problem is with fanatics, and there are plenty of fanatics of all stripes running around.

How long, for example, until those Haredi nuts in Beit Shemesh beat some Dati Leumi girl to death for walking too near a boy or not conforming to Haredi dress standards? Again, the only reason these people aren't just as dangerous as Islamic fanatics is there are fewer of them. To be clear, I am not equating a gang of men beating up 15 year old girls to Hamas lobbing missiles at Israeli civilians, but I am equating the mindsets. We don't like what you do/what you believe/who you are, and we feel you are forcing your beliefs/yourselves on us, so we have the right to attack you. They're acting against their self-interest, but they don't see it that way- on the contrary.

There will NEVER be peace in the Middle-East, until the Arabs BEG us to stop killing them. Sadly, Israel yet lacks the fibre/desperation to actually retaliate properly, so that won't happen either. Certainly not in THIS round of fighting.

This sounds similar to the position of Hamas and other Islamic radical groups. "If we just kill enough Jews, they'll go away." Do you think that's going to work for them? If not, why do you think it will work for you?
Previous Entry  Next Entry